Was Mahatma Gandhi responsible for destroying India, and is that why he is so "famous" among India's enemies?

His opposition to Science and Industry is the reason India missed its Industrial Revolution and is now in constant mortal danger from China. His softness in negotiating with seperationists led to the creation of Pakistan, that is now a constant thorn in India's side,diverting its resources and keeping both India and Pakistan from developing as fast as they otherwise could. His mistaken 'ahimsa' is see by all other nations for what it is-weakness appealing to a potential enemy's "good side" which may or may not exist, and which in most cases doesn't. India achieved Independence only because Britain had been too ravaged by the second world war to hold on, not because any appeal to their 'good side' worked (they didn't have one).India was not held down by British soldiers but by Indian soldiers working for British money (their ill-begotten pirate gains from all parts of their "empire") The British could no longer rely on this Indian soldiery to hold India down for them, and so gave in-much against their own wishes. There was a very real possibility of a repeat of the 1857 "Sepoy mutiny" so-called. This time it would have worked, and the British would have been kicked out by the seat of their pants, as they deserved. This way, they were able to avoid that ignominy, to make it seem as though an appeal to their non-existent "good side" had worked, and to preserve their "Britain's pride". Gandhi owes his "fame" to Brit-****. Secretly, they laugh at him, as well they might! "Cause the "Good Side" just ain't there. India needs a revival of the Thug movement.